I
met with Dr. Troy Harcey to talk about his calendar of activities for
each year. Troy was a teacher, Assistant Principal, Principal, and
now Associate Superintendent. Some of the regular, standing meetings
that require preparation include board of education meetings, weekly
IRT (Instructional Review Team) meetings, monthly DLT (District
Leadership Team) meetings, principal meetings, Curriculum Team
meetings, to name a few. During the course of the year, there are
definitely “seasons” that recur: summer means planning for
beginning of the year staff development, training on new initiatives,
and a review of program profiles. Fall involves reports on class
sizes, determining how to support teachers in the implementation of
programs, framing up the choice and charter entrance procedures, and
being visible in schools. Winter is when preliminary budget
reductions are calculated and the structure for rolling out program
or staffing cuts is determined. Spring is when contracts are issued,
construction is scheduled, programs are evaluated based on data
collected over the year, and all sights are placed on getting the
next school year ready to go.
We
spent a lot of time talking about the “unplanned” things that can
consume days and even weeks. For example, he likened media/open
records requests to the “upset parent” scenarios that play out at
school. His current work was revolving around the question, “How
much did Common Core cost?” As you know, there are layers upon
layers to this question making it very difficult to give a figure.
Rely
on experts...we can't possibly know everything that is going on. If
we do, there's not enough going on! Part of the work of
superintendents is to arrange people so that they can be most
effective and make the best decisions while playing to their
strengths and areas of expertise. Our superintendent uses Dr. Harcey
the same way.
We
talked about the political/public nature of things these days. When
an upset parent didn't get satisfaction, they used to say, “I'm
going to the school board with this.” Now, that parent says, “I'm
taking this to the media.”
Board
relations...transparency builds trust. Our superintendent took lots
of time to develop personal and professional relationships with our
board. Our superintendent keeps the board apprised of what is
happening and deeply values transparency.
Collective
effort...we need to work together and build on each others' gifts.
Building social capital is a goal for Dr. Harcey.
We
spoke about some of the things we are seeing that blur our focus on
student learning: there is not enough teacher prep compared to other
countries, we want our staff to be proud of our district, we want our
staff to love coming to work (the “way it used to be”), we worry
about prospective teachers who are being turned off to education...we
need to put instruction back in the driver's seat (not technology,
not assessment).
We
discussed never ending issue with regard to communication in a large
district. There is always someone who feels like they were left out
of a communication circle.
We
talked about the importance of emphasizing where we are going...not
where we've been.
Sometimes
resources are the answer, sometimes they are not.
We
are going to have to get uncomfortable with instruction in order to
improve it.
Using
Blanchard's situational leadership model, there were many signs of
Dr. Harcey being a “delegating” leader. He is a passionate
leader but mentioned “getting the right people in the right places
in order to maximize the use of their expertise.” He also spoke of
relying on experts and realizing that he was going to have to trust
the leaders in program areas to come up with innovative program
suggestions. There were also elements of the “supportive”
leader. His leadership style has never been a directive one.
Using
Blake's model, Dr. Harcey was very high on concern for people and
lower on concern for product. He spoke of people's job satisfaction,
concern for pride in our schools, etc. He talked about building
social capital. At several points during our conversation, I asked
directly about continuous improvement and our conversation took a
different turn.
Dr.
Harcey's leadership resonates with me and I see a lot of myself
reflected in him. To this end, while I really enjoy meeting with him
and value our professional relationship, I know that if I'm ever to
grow, I'll need to spend some time with leaders who are more
directive and product-oriented.
I appreciate that your interview with Dr. Harcey captured the multifaceted issues facing those in educational leadership. The point made about in larger districts someone always feels like they are left out of the communication circle really hit home. This is truly a never ending issue in our district as well. I hope we have an opportunity to discuss this in class.
ReplyDeleteSteve,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your interview of Dr. Harcey. In reading this, when I had the opportunity to work with and for Dr. Harcey a great deal of the topics that he touched on as an Associate Superintendent rang true when I knew him in all of his previous roles. I certainly see Dr. Harcey as a "delegating" leader. He is very tuned into the strengths of his staff members and how these strengths can be utilized to move learning, a school, and now a district forward.
It was interesting to read your post which depicts a larger school district perspective and compare that information to my own findings from a much smaller school district.
ReplyDeleteThe main differences are found in the distribution of roles. In your district, superintendent roles are distributed among three individuals. In my district, the superintendent role is fulfilled by one individual who also wears the hats of curriculum director and business manager.
On the other hand, similarities were also apparent. This is especially true in the emphasis on communication, keeping stakeholders well informed, and working effectively with the media/community.
Steve,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your blog partly to because of the perspective from a larger district and also because I like how you can analyze the actions and motivations of people so well.
It sounds like Dr. Harcey is an effective leader, who understands a lot about the theories that we are learning. At the same time, he seems, to be a bit more on the authoritarian quadrant of Blake and Mouton's managerial grid. I believe that it becomes more and more difficult the larger your organization becomes to land in that Team Leader area, for many of the reasons you mentioned; keeping the communication flowing to all those in the organization and finding the time and aligning the resources to focus on that ever important task of improving instruction.