Interview with Connie Troynek, School District of La Crosse-Board of Education President
1.
How does the board know that the district’s vision and mission reflect
the student achievement expectations and needs of the community?
Dream,
Believe, Achieve is what we envision...what parents dream...this is our
goal to help all students have success in many different fashions...not
all are members of sports teams, academic decathalon, etc. Our mission
is short Dream, Believe, Achieve. Our vision is too wordy. We have
many community partners...this is one way in which we gauge how we are
doing with comm. expectations. Different linkages on a regular basis,
northside neighbors, senior centers, etc. This is an integral part of
our plan...gp7e is our calendar of events. Rebuilding for relearning
community summit...breaking down barriers...how do educate those kids
who are in survival mode.
2. How does the school board evaluate itself in terms of student achievement?
Monitoring
reports. We monitor not only reports that come in from staff, but we
monitor ourselves including whether or not we are meeting our goals
(exec. comm.)? Is our policy written so that it is accomplishing what
we intend it to. Do we have the information that we need to get.
School profiles, student achievement...in the fall we will look at
standards-based academic programming.
2A.
(I went on a tangent here) Tell me about how you go about bringing on
new board members, indoctrinating them in policy governance.
We
sit down with all candidates even before they run to explain what
policy governance is...we don’t micromanage...we hire good people to do
that job...I’m a school nurse, not a teacher. Randy Nelson is the only
person that is accountable to the board. We do sit on committees, but
when it comes to us for a vote, we approve. I don’t think we could ever
go back to functioning any other way. We need to remind ourselves from
time to time...
3.
Do the school board, administrators, and staff model mutual respect,
professional behavior, and a commitment to continuous learning?
Absolutely.
Working in another district, with ACT 10 for example. There were a
lot of districts who said, “this is what we can do, so we’re going to do
it.” We didn’t...we brought people in and listened to them. The board
has tremendous respect for everyone that is working in the district. I
sometimes hope that our community would do the same. We are able to
banter back and forth and be friends...other boards are not that way.
We are proud of our institutional history on the board and longevity of
the members...we have Ken.
4.
What is the level of understanding/commitment within the board and
district administration related to continuous improvement?
We
are all about continuous improvement. We want everyone to take classes
and we have workshops ourselves. There are so many initiatives out
there. We need to keep informed of these things. We feel it’s
necessary for administrators and staff to keep abreast of learning. We
are all educators…we need to have our people trained. We encourage
this...we are educators and are in the business of continuous
improvement. Without it, we are not providing the quality education we
should be.
5. How does the board ensure that policy and budget decisions are research-based and data-driven?
The
data retreat...we get data on a continual basis. Last night we got
data on homebound programming. We don’t make decisions unless we know
what the outcomes will be and the reason for it. We need data to back
it up. We need follow up.
Based
on the responses to these questions, I am very pleased with our board
president. By the way, she has served for many, many terms and this
type of longevity on the board is common. Though I am scrutinizing
responses as part of my professional growth, I realize how fortunate I
am to have such a supportive board that understands policy governance
and why it is important for the culture of our district. There was only
one area in which I will seek clarification and that is with regard to
continuous improvement. With all of the things our district does so
well, I think that embracing the concept of continuous improvement
through a PDSA or similar model would yield even greater student
successes. This is a concept that needs to be embraced on a
district-wide level, complete with training for board, administration,
and teachers as people are all over the map in their understanding of
it. I believe that this confusion between continuous improvement and
professional development is widespread in our district.
As
superintendent, I would encourage our board president to assist in
redefining our district vision. It IS too long, it IS too hard to
remember and isn’t referred to nearly often enough as a result. This
needs to be a thoughtful statement that is referred to in word and deed
frequently and is an important part of our correspondence internally and
externally.
“Students will:
Discover
their talents and abilities and will be prepared to pursue their dreams
and aspirations while contributing effectively to their local,
national, and global communities.
Demonstrate
continuous improvement toward a high level of individual success in all
required and elective academic/curricular areas using multiple measures
of performance.
Strive for mutual understanding as contributing citizens in a diverse world and global community.
Acquire the knowledge and skills necessary to make effective and responsible life choices.”
Secondly,
I would engage the board in professional development about continuous
improvement. By building capacity within the board first, I believe I
could nurture a cultural shift in our district toward utilizing
continuous improvement in our operations.
Finally,
I would engage the board in more studies wherein we would look to
similar-sized districts who are achieving at higher levels to learn what
practices are working for them. For example, Janesville. Similar
size, similar demographics, much higher rates of student success. What
can we learn from Janesville (and other districts) that would help us
improve?